![]() I was on #wikipedia at the time, mentioned the new artwork, and an admin at the time noticed it was signed with Kasuga's name. I think I can shed some light onto why it was deleted. I didn't delete it, here, or at the Commons. Jmh123 15:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC) So, basically you are saying that because it's Wikipe-tan, people could think that "Wikipedia endorses lolicon!" which in turn leads to people deleting the content, even if it was very relevant and completely free to use? Wouldn't that be basically deleting stuff just because they don't like it, and thus, not allowed? 83.245.135.80 19:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC) I have no idea why it was deleted. Someone gunning for Wikipedia could have a field day with it. ![]() It gave me pause, and I have some knowledge of the situation. I can see it now as the banner for anti-Wikipedia articles. Smart thing to do would be to just accept the image as a compromise rather than have /a/ get ticked off again and start replacing it with random images.- Carcer 15:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Having an image named after Wikipedia and incorporating Wikipedia symbols creates the impression of endorsement. 83.245.135.80 10:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Probably just someone who has a beef with 4chan and doesn't want them to have anything to do with wikipedia. tjstrf talk 09:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC) This, my friend, is ridiculous. 83.245.135.80 09:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Hey Ruylong, can you tell us why did you restore Kristal's image instead of the Wikipe-tan one? - 83.245.135.80 09:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Because Kristal's isn't a redlink. tjstrf talk 08:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC) I really hope so, because now the old fugly image is back. Okay, now who removed the new image? - 83.245.135.80 08:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Bah, it was deleted on some technicality. Merovingian ※ Talk 19:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Īny reason not to use both images? - tjstrf talk 21:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC) ![]() contribs) How about something along the lines of Lolicon art often depicts childlike characters in suggestive situations.? - Merovingian ※ Talk 19:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Yeah, that'd fit better.Preceding unsigned comment added by Carcer ( talk Merovingian ※ Talk 17:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC) The old caption for the new picture doesn't really fit. And please remember that somebody put time into making it simply getting rid of it would not be the nicest thing to do. While the picture may not be the best, I for one do think it is representative of the genre. Although I do not have firsthand experience, there has already been considerable debate here as to the picture. Although I only speak for myself, I am sure we would be more than happy to accept original-content images so long as they are correctly licensed, etc. When it contains copyrighted characters, the problem is compounded. ![]() Simply replacing the current image in this article with one of your own choosing is not okay. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |